<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: google leveraging adwords to promote base&#8217;s job listings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2005/12/26/google-leveraging-adwords-to-promote-bases-job-listings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2005/12/26/google-leveraging-adwords-to-promote-bases-job-listings/</link>
	<description>Insight and opinion from the world of employment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:01:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2005/12/26/google-leveraging-adwords-to-promote-bases-job-listings/comment-page-1/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 18:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2005/12/26/google-leveraging-adwords-to-promote-bases-job-listings/#comment-414</guid>
		<description>Last week, Google added an intermediate page to job links and other submissions to Google Base.  Instead of pointing directly to the URL that was submitted for the job - the user will now first land on a &quot;jump page&quot; so that the user can get &quot;more information&quot; before clicking on to the destination page.  What is your take on this?  Feel free to read our comments here - http://www.exceler8ion.com/2006/01/02/google-base-adds-intermediate-jump-pages-to-jobs-links/
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, Google added an intermediate page to job links and other submissions to Google Base.  Instead of pointing directly to the URL that was submitted for the job &#8211; the user will now first land on a &#8220;jump page&#8221; so that the user can get &#8220;more information&#8221; before clicking on to the destination page.  What is your take on this?  Feel free to read our comments here &#8211; <a href="http://www.exceler8ion.com/2006/01/02/google-base-adds-intermediate-jump-pages-to-jobs-links/" rel="nofollow">http://www.exceler8ion.com/2006/01/02/google-base-adds-intermediate-jump-pages-to-jobs-links/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claude Gelinas</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2005/12/26/google-leveraging-adwords-to-promote-bases-job-listings/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Claude Gelinas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 08:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2005/12/26/google-leveraging-adwords-to-promote-bases-job-listings/#comment-413</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, &quot;Base&quot; from Google doesn&#039;t offer anything more than basic information posting, as far as jobs -or anything else- is concerned.

Out of curiosity, I posted a few interesting jobs on Google Base and it appears nobody even visited the pages... which is surprising considering this is the mighty Google, after all.

A close friend posted on GB for an entirely different reason and was also very unimpressed (no answer, whatsoever).

Maybe GB will get better over time but right now, it&#039;s probably safe to say although lots of people may be posting, not too many are actively &quot;reading&quot;!

Have some other users had success with GB?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, &#8220;Base&#8221; from Google doesn&#8217;t offer anything more than basic information posting, as far as jobs -or anything else- is concerned.</p>
<p>Out of curiosity, I posted a few interesting jobs on Google Base and it appears nobody even visited the pages&#8230; which is surprising considering this is the mighty Google, after all.</p>
<p>A close friend posted on GB for an entirely different reason and was also very unimpressed (no answer, whatsoever).</p>
<p>Maybe GB will get better over time but right now, it&#8217;s probably safe to say although lots of people may be posting, not too many are actively &#8220;reading&#8221;!</p>
<p>Have some other users had success with GB?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.480 seconds -->
