Sponsored by Job CentralRSS

craigslist to google: we don’t need you

Mon, Jan 2, 2006

Articles

There’s a line in Wall Street when Michael Douglas’s character Gordon Gekko says, "Money never sleeps, pal."

Neither does the the world of search. Not even during New Year’s. One of the reasons I love it so much.

Let’s touch on a few recent newsworthy happenings:

1. Google Base. The search giant has started adding "jump pages" to its listings. Instead of sending a user directly to CareerBuilder, for example, from a list of results, Google sends users to a Google page that hosts the content.

Click here for an example. Big difference, huh?

From what I can tell, Google is doing this with all their listings from job sites that apparently upload content to the search giant.

I can’t imagine any board liking this idea. Your content might get extra exposure, and you will get more traffic. However, Google is taking your brand and flushing it down the proverbial toilet in the process.

Why did Google do this? My guess is that hosting the content with jump pages allows for more advertising real estate so the kids in Mountain View can toss more coins into the coffers.

Cool or uncool? Craigslist votes uncool, which brings us to No. 2:

2. Craigslist. According to a recent forum thread on Search Engine Roundtable, Craigslist has recently blocked Google and other search spiders from scraping specific content, which apparently includes job listings.

Not too long ago, Craigslist banned classified aggregator Oodle from spidering its content. Job verticals like Indeed and SimplyHired were spared.

Because of Craig’s ever-so-hippie demeanor since its inception, this seemed pretty odd to a lot of people. However, since Oodle certainly needed Craig more than the other way around, it was understood and accepted.

Banning Google, Yahoo!, MSN and everyone else, however, is a far more grandiose statement by Craigslist, basically telling search engines, Stick it, we don’t need you.

I can’t say I agree with this ‘walled garden’ mentality as a  widespread, long term strategy, but I do understand it. And I do envy Craig for being in such a position and taking such action.

In my predictions  for 2006, I said a major employer would receive money from a job site in order to get exclusivity over at least a portion of its job content. This stand by Craig is saying to the consumer, If you want to see jobs on Craigslist, the only place you can go is Craiglist. This strategy helps solidify their own userbase and marketshare while keeping Google at bay in the process.

So, what’s Google’s next move, and will other job sites follow Craig’s lead and turn off the aggregation faucet?

The answer may lie in another line from Wall Street: "What’s worth doing is worth doing for money."

Popularity: 1% [?]







Join Our Mailing List

Cheezhead's FREE Insider E-Mail (Get the Stuff Regular Readers Don't)



We're on Facebook!

Cheezhead | Promote Your Page Too
Cheezhead


Job Search

 Ex : sales, "software engineer"   Location(s) Ex : Dallas,TX or 75219 or TX
 


Other Posts



This post was written by:

Joel Cheesman - who has written 1471 posts on Cheezhead Recruiting News and Opinion.

One of the most widely-read bloggers on emerging recruitment issues in the world. Accomplishments include being named Recruiting.com’s Best Technology Recruitment Blog and Best Recruiting Blog. Joel's been featured in Fast Company magazine, BusinessWeek Magazine, Resumes for Dummies, U.S. News & World Report, The Wall Street Journal and more. Plug into Joel via Twitter, MySpace, Facebook, iTunes, YouTube or Flickr.

Contact the author

2 Comments For This Post

  1. gaby Says:

    I bet the base is for future indexing of web content. The way organic search it’s done at the moment could stop working any moment. They have piles of data for each page, only makes sense to allow us to search by those criteria. Sure there will be adds, don’t they stuff that on anything after 2 weeks of beta?

  2. Steven Rothberg Says:

    The good folks at Craigslist and I disagree over whether the entry of Google into classified advertising is a net positive or negative for our job board businesses. They apparently have decided that it is a net negative to work with Google. We feel that it is a net positive.

    Like most things in life, this is not a black-and-white issue. We are working with Google to make jobs posted to CollegeRecruiter.com part of the Google Base listings. While we anticipate that we’ll lose some revenues and incur some added expenses, we also anticipate that we’ll see a significant increase in traffic and that should translate into increased revenues which should be high enough to increase the net.

    Personally, I think that the entry of Google and MSN is great simply because it adds two more worthy competitors. Their actions will force all job boards to be better. We also need to do a better job for the candidates and our clients. And if worrying about Google and MSN forces job boards to do a better job, then so be it.

    Steven Rothberg, President and Founder
    CollegeRecruiter.com job board
    http://www.CollegeRecruiter.com

Leave a Reply