<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: simplycentralgoogleindeed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/01/15/simplycentralgoogleindeed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/01/15/simplycentralgoogleindeed/</link>
	<description>Insight and opinion from the world of employment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:01:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave McClure</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/01/15/simplycentralgoogleindeed/comment-page-1/#comment-447</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave McClure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/01/15/simplycentralgoogleindeed/#comment-447</guid>
		<description>the Times report has several inaccuracies.

we&#039;re in the process of asking them to clarify.

in any case, we&#039;ll be issuing a further statement tomorrow.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the Times report has several inaccuracies.</p>
<p>we&#8217;re in the process of asking them to clarify.</p>
<p>in any case, we&#8217;ll be issuing a further statement tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/01/15/simplycentralgoogleindeed/comment-page-1/#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/01/15/simplycentralgoogleindeed/#comment-446</guid>
		<description>Joel,
I think this is a bad move for Simplyhired and Indeed. Since they are playing with a Monster/CB/HotJobs direct competitor, I think this will speed up the process of them banning the aggregators. We&#039;ll see how it plays out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel,<br />
I think this is a bad move for Simplyhired and Indeed. Since they are playing with a Monster/CB/HotJobs direct competitor, I think this will speed up the process of them banning the aggregators. We&#8217;ll see how it plays out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

