<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: where do employees go online?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/05/24/where-do-employees-go-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/05/24/where-do-employees-go-online/</link>
	<description>Insight and opinion from the world of employment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:01:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Gilliatt</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/05/24/where-do-employees-go-online/comment-page-1/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Gilliatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 21:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/05/24/where-do-employees-go-online/#comment-807</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s easy to assume that IT managers with access to access logs can report more accurately than users on their use of non-work-related web sites. The log doesn&#039;t know users&#039; motivation, though, and the survey sponsor has an incentive to presume the worst.

Websense, of  course, wants companies to decide that they really need web filtering. I won&#039;t try to defend the sports or adult sites as work-related, but it is possible for some of the others to be work-related, at least some of the time. For example, business travellers could find work-related information on weather, maps and travel sites. Blogs--now there&#039;s a broad category! Is Cheezhead work-related reading?

Hacking and keylogging sites sound like a security problem to me, probably something the end user doesn&#039;t even know his computer is doing.

News, education, stocks/investing, government and more *could* be work-related. I encourage clients to use many of these sites as free information sources for market intelligence.I could go on. The point is that a simple compilation of sites visited tells you exactly that--sites visited. Determining what is work-related is a bit more complicated.

Which doesn&#039;t even get into the blurring boundaries between work and personal life that don&#039;t seem to bother companies when work seeps into personal time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s easy to assume that IT managers with access to access logs can report more accurately than users on their use of non-work-related web sites. The log doesn&#8217;t know users&#8217; motivation, though, and the survey sponsor has an incentive to presume the worst.</p>
<p>Websense, of  course, wants companies to decide that they really need web filtering. I won&#8217;t try to defend the sports or adult sites as work-related, but it is possible for some of the others to be work-related, at least some of the time. For example, business travellers could find work-related information on weather, maps and travel sites. Blogs&#8211;now there&#8217;s a broad category! Is Cheezhead work-related reading?</p>
<p>Hacking and keylogging sites sound like a security problem to me, probably something the end user doesn&#8217;t even know his computer is doing.</p>
<p>News, education, stocks/investing, government and more *could* be work-related. I encourage clients to use many of these sites as free information sources for market intelligence.I could go on. The point is that a simple compilation of sites visited tells you exactly that&#8211;sites visited. Determining what is work-related is a bit more complicated.</p>
<p>Which doesn&#8217;t even get into the blurring boundaries between work and personal life that don&#8217;t seem to bother companies when work seeps into personal time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

