<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: vertical job search buzzworthiness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/06/08/vertical-job-search-buzzworthiness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/06/08/vertical-job-search-buzzworthiness/</link>
	<description>Insight and opinion from the world of employment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:01:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amitai Givertz</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/06/08/vertical-job-search-buzzworthiness/comment-page-1/#comment-1000</link>
		<dc:creator>Amitai Givertz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 20:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/06/08/vertical-job-search-buzzworthiness/#comment-1000</guid>
		<description>Joel - very interesting. However, doesn&#039;t this disclaimer on Google&#039;s site give you any pause for concern:

&#039;Google Trends aims to provide insights into broad search patterns. As a Google Labs product, it is still in the early stages of development. Also, it is based upon just a portion of our searches, and several approximations are used when computing your results. Please keep this in mind when using it.&#039;

As I read it, this means the data could be as good as useless. Or am I missing something?

Amitai</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel &#8211; very interesting. However, doesn&#8217;t this disclaimer on Google&#8217;s site give you any pause for concern:</p>
<p>&#8216;Google Trends aims to provide insights into broad search patterns. As a Google Labs product, it is still in the early stages of development. Also, it is based upon just a portion of our searches, and several approximations are used when computing your results. Please keep this in mind when using it.&#8217;</p>
<p>As I read it, this means the data could be as good as useless. Or am I missing something?</p>
<p>Amitai</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.547 seconds -->
