<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: dude, where&#8217;s your job content?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/07/24/monster-flipdog-job-aggregation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/07/24/monster-flipdog-job-aggregation/</link>
	<description>Insight and opinion from the world of employment.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 05:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: VolFanCT</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/07/24/monster-flipdog-job-aggregation/#comment-1476</link>
		<dc:creator>VolFanCT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/07/24/monster-flipdog-job-aggregation/#comment-1476</guid>
		<description>Obviously Monster is making a profound statement by venturing into the Vertical search arena, but it would be to the determent of the Monster brand if they were to turn to true vertical search.  I am certain they will begin to aggregate positions from other sources, but I would be shocked if they were to aggregate the likes of competitors such as Careerbuilder or HotJobs.  With sites such as indeed.com leading the way, Monster seems to be a little late to the party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously Monster is making a profound statement by venturing into the Vertical search arena, but it would be to the determent of the Monster brand if they were to turn to true vertical search.  I am certain they will begin to aggregate positions from other sources, but I would be shocked if they were to aggregate the likes of competitors such as Careerbuilder or HotJobs.  With sites such as indeed.com leading the way, Monster seems to be a little late to the party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisr2</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/07/24/monster-flipdog-job-aggregation/#comment-1470</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisr2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/07/24/monster-flipdog-job-aggregation/#comment-1470</guid>
		<description>You cant ignore the SEO boost they will get from it...literally thousands of  sites currently link to flipdog.com....Thats more traffic for all of monster's jobs. From a traffic standpoint its a no-brainer.

Perhaps they will include others sites 'ala' HotJobs but Monster jobs will always come first. But somehow I cant see them turning into an Indeed without skewing results to their own jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You cant ignore the SEO boost they will get from it&#8230;literally thousands of  sites currently link to flipdog.com&#8230;.Thats more traffic for all of monster&#8217;s jobs. From a traffic standpoint its a no-brainer.</p>
<p>Perhaps they will include others sites &#8216;ala&#8217; HotJobs but Monster jobs will always come first. But somehow I cant see them turning into an Indeed without skewing results to their own jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.286 seconds -->
