Sponsored by Job CentralRSS

.jobs, .edu, .com … no difference says google

Fri, Aug 25, 2006

Articles

Listen to mins. 4-5 and you’ll hear ‘Google Guy’ Matt Cutts say the reason .edu’s and .gov’s have such high PageRank, and thus are great sites to get links from, has more to do with the age of their sites and the quality backlinks they have.

For the longest time, SEOs - me included - estimated that in addition to the usual suspects, these sites were such great domains in the eyes of Google because of the difficult process of getting such URLs, usually involving human intervention. Anyone can get a .com; not everyone can get a .gov.

(Video)

Such commentary isn’t good news for the .jobs domain.

When acquiring these domains, there is a high level of human intervention in the approval process. Theoretically, this would give .jobs a leg-up in the algos because of the higher level of trust. Real jobs; real companies. Not so, says Matt Cutts.

Ray Fassett of .jobs replies to the video:

I don’t see it as a hit per se. First, efforts to optimize a .jobs site will produce search engine results with Google. You can’t escape the effort required. Secondly, regardless of Google, we have an obligation as the licensed operator to ensure that .jobs URLs contain jobs content for users of the Internet. Following through with this mission will get us relevance in some capacity at Google, I am confident.

Time will tell how this plays out. Some SEOs still debate whether Matt is being totally truthful or not. I tend to believe him. To lie would be “evil,” right? Plus, Matt usually does a great job of being truthful, while not giving away Google’s secrets.

Regardless, there is no denying the fact that having a homepage and essentially a niche job site dedicated to job content at a particular employer’s site is helpful as search engine optimization goes. And having “jobs” in your URL isn’t a bad thing either. Other benefits could show themselves if things go one way or another, but that’s all scenery at the moment.

However, much of the speculation and expectation about .jobs domains being a “silver bullet,” are probably over. It still comes down to good ol’ fashioned hard (and smart) work.

Job boards should treat themselves to an extra drink at Happy Hour this evening. Then get back to busily out-optimizing each other.

~~~~~~~~~~

uCheez: Employment Site Shuffle

Popularity: 2% [?]







Join Our Mailing List

Cheezhead's FREE Insider E-Mail (Get the Stuff Regular Readers Don't)



We're on Facebook!

Cheezhead | Promote Your Page Too
Cheezhead


Job Search

 Ex : sales, "software engineer"   Location(s) Ex : Dallas,TX or 75219 or TX
 


Other Posts



This post was written by:

Joel Cheesman - who has written 1433 posts on Cheezhead Recruiting News and Opinion.

One of the most widely-read bloggers on emerging recruitment issues in the world. Accomplishments include being named Recruiting.com’s Best Technology Recruitment Blog and Best Recruiting Blog. Joel's been featured in Fast Company magazine, BusinessWeek Magazine, Resumes for Dummies, U.S. News & World Report, The Wall Street Journal and more. Plug into Joel via Twitter, MySpace, Facebook, iTunes, YouTube or Flickr.

Contact the author

2 Comments For This Post

  1. Recruitomatic Says:

    Joel, it seems to me that in a very short time there has been an 180 dgree change in views. Is this a debate that will fizzle out like the .biz adveture?

    My POV (coudn’t ping here) http://recruitomatic.wordpress.com/?s=whataloadofrubbish

    Amitai

  2. Scott Saunders Says:

    Is it just me or am I missing something?

    Suppose the HR industry were to organize a movement to get all companies to post their jobs in a standardized format using HRXML on their own .jobs domain. This way the engines could trust the results were coming from real companies and even the most basic engines could pick up the results. Job searchers could be redirected to the front of the “search jobs” in the company’s career section (not that anyone uses the .jobs domain for searching anyway)

    Why wouldn’t this work? Cheesy - why don’t you drive this?

Leave a Reply