<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: getting the most out of your next print ad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/12/18/google-print-ad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/12/18/google-print-ad/</link>
	<description>Insight and opinion from the world of employment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:01:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Dalka</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/12/18/google-print-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-4485</link>
		<dc:creator>David Dalka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 20:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/12/18/google-print-ad/#comment-4485</guid>
		<description>There is no doubt that Google is a PR department of high usage. But they also do a ton of job listing advertising (which based on the resumes they already receive is totally unecessary). Why do they do this? Branding.

To praise these campaigns as &quot;efficient ROI&quot; would be at best questionable and a complete assumption. In September, Google advertised in United Airlines magazine, only to have the link to the microsite not work for the first three weeks of the month. 
http://daviddalka.com/createvalue/2006/09/23/google-recruiting-error-fixed/

In fact, if you click all the way to an actual job, there is no distinct URL coming from this microsite than if you just surfed in. I&#039;d ask you to reconsider this post about ROI tracking because I think you are giving way too much credit here!!! 

Happy Holidays! 

Sincerely, 
Dave aka, http://www.nextgoogleceo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no doubt that Google is a PR department of high usage. But they also do a ton of job listing advertising (which based on the resumes they already receive is totally unecessary). Why do they do this? Branding.</p>
<p>To praise these campaigns as &#8220;efficient ROI&#8221; would be at best questionable and a complete assumption. In September, Google advertised in United Airlines magazine, only to have the link to the microsite not work for the first three weeks of the month.<br />
<a href="http://daviddalka.com/createvalue/2006/09/23/google-recruiting-error-fixed/" rel="nofollow">http://daviddalka.com/createvalue/2006/09/23/google-recruiting-error-fixed/</a></p>
<p>In fact, if you click all the way to an actual job, there is no distinct URL coming from this microsite than if you just surfed in. I&#8217;d ask you to reconsider this post about ROI tracking because I think you are giving way too much credit here!!! </p>
<p>Happy Holidays! </p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Dave aka, <a href="http://www.nextgoogleceo.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.nextgoogleceo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alohandra</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/12/18/google-print-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-4334</link>
		<dc:creator>alohandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/12/18/google-print-ad/#comment-4334</guid>
		<description>Joel,

ATS&#039; do this all the time and have been doing it for years.  It&#039;s called sourcing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel,</p>
<p>ATS&#8217; do this all the time and have been doing it for years.  It&#8217;s called sourcing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marianne</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/12/18/google-print-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-4322</link>
		<dc:creator>Marianne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/12/18/google-print-ad/#comment-4322</guid>
		<description>Hi Joel,

I&#039;ve seen this starting the last year in the recruitment industry in Belgium. Recruiters are using different reference numbers when placing there ads in our recruitment magazine (ref1),on our internet site (ref2),  or those of our competitors (ref 3 till ..)

There&#039;s quite some recruitmtent &amp; selection agencies e.g. calculating from there not only the number of cv&#039;s received via each medium, but also the number of candidates selected for a first interview, the number of  candidates that are proposed to a client and the number of candidates that actually get a contract. These ratio&#039;s (toghether with the price) really give them a great overview of the ROI of each medium...

Bye
Marianne - www.vacature.com - Belgium</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joel,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen this starting the last year in the recruitment industry in Belgium. Recruiters are using different reference numbers when placing there ads in our recruitment magazine (ref1),on our internet site (ref2),  or those of our competitors (ref 3 till ..)</p>
<p>There&#8217;s quite some recruitmtent &amp; selection agencies e.g. calculating from there not only the number of cv&#8217;s received via each medium, but also the number of candidates selected for a first interview, the number of  candidates that are proposed to a client and the number of candidates that actually get a contract. These ratio&#8217;s (toghether with the price) really give them a great overview of the ROI of each medium&#8230;</p>
<p>Bye<br />
Marianne &#8211; <a href="http://www.vacature.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.vacature.com</a> &#8211; Belgium</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.718 seconds -->
