<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: simply hired introduces banners ads, jumps shark?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/02/12/simplyhired-jumps-shark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/02/12/simplyhired-jumps-shark/</link>
	<description>Insight and opinion from the world of employment.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 06:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Stubblebine</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/02/12/simplyhired-jumps-shark/#comment-12203</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Stubblebine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/02/12/simplyhired-jumps-shark/#comment-12203</guid>
		<description>Since the banners are related to the content and add some nice color to the page in a non-intrusive manner, I think they go hand-in-hand with the search results and make sense.  

However, as you had pointed out in previous examples, when a job board starts serving out Miller Light ads, then we got a problem.  And since they're not weighting the search results to give higher placement to companies who are purchasing banners (2 Java jobs show up from JobCircle.com on position 4 and 6 and we don’t buy banners), I don't have a problem with it.  I'd bet that jobseekers probably don't either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the banners are related to the content and add some nice color to the page in a non-intrusive manner, I think they go hand-in-hand with the search results and make sense.  </p>
<p>However, as you had pointed out in previous examples, when a job board starts serving out Miller Light ads, then we got a problem.  And since they&#8217;re not weighting the search results to give higher placement to companies who are purchasing banners (2 Java jobs show up from JobCircle.com on position 4 and 6 and we don’t buy banners), I don&#8217;t have a problem with it.  I&#8217;d bet that jobseekers probably don&#8217;t either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Sowash</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/02/12/simplyhired-jumps-shark/#comment-12160</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Sowash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/02/12/simplyhired-jumps-shark/#comment-12160</guid>
		<description>Joel, Didn't you say "The greatest risk in life is to not take any"? Much like your JobThread, SimplyCheezJobs, UCheez, and a litany of other CheezRisks they're trying something new to see if it resonates with jobseekers and new perspective advertisers.  I'm not sure this risk involves a shark just yet.

In case you forgot: http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/12/20/happycheezyholidayvideo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel, Didn&#8217;t you say &#8220;The greatest risk in life is to not take any&#8221;? Much like your JobThread, SimplyCheezJobs, UCheez, and a litany of other CheezRisks they&#8217;re trying something new to see if it resonates with jobseekers and new perspective advertisers.  I&#8217;m not sure this risk involves a shark just yet.</p>
<p>In case you forgot: <a href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/12/20/happycheezyholidayvideo" rel="nofollow">http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/12/20/happycheezyholidayvideo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doron</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/02/12/simplyhired-jumps-shark/#comment-12079</link>
		<dc:creator>Doron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 03:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/02/12/simplyhired-jumps-shark/#comment-12079</guid>
		<description>"Once a job board has "jumped the shark", fans sense a noticeable decline in quality or feel the job board has undergone too many changes to retain its original charm."

Quality is still the same i guess and there's not much that has been changed- for me a "nah". And whats wrong with making some bucks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Once a job board has &#8220;jumped the shark&#8221;, fans sense a noticeable decline in quality or feel the job board has undergone too many changes to retain its original charm.&#8221;</p>
<p>Quality is still the same i guess and there&#8217;s not much that has been changed- for me a &#8220;nah&#8221;. And whats wrong with making some bucks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
