<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: union pacific .jobs domain kickin&#8217; google ranking butt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/04/30/union-pacific-jobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/04/30/union-pacific-jobs/</link>
	<description>Insight and opinion from the world of employment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:01:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SEOBuilder</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/04/30/union-pacific-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-25127</link>
		<dc:creator>SEOBuilder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 11:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/04/30/union-pacific-jobs/#comment-25127</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised you haven&#039;t picked up on Google booting CareerBuilder from their index.  You won&#039;t find them #1 anymore for any important keywords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised you haven&#8217;t picked up on Google booting CareerBuilder from their index.  You won&#8217;t find them #1 anymore for any important keywords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alohandra</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/04/30/union-pacific-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-24866</link>
		<dc:creator>alohandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 20:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/04/30/union-pacific-jobs/#comment-24866</guid>
		<description>Any indication if MSN and Yahoo! follow the same algorithm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any indication if MSN and Yahoo! follow the same algorithm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/04/30/union-pacific-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-24865</link>
		<dc:creator>joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 20:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/04/30/union-pacific-jobs/#comment-24865</guid>
		<description>http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/08/25/google-matt-cutts-on-dot-jobs-domain/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/08/25/google-matt-cutts-on-dot-jobs-domain/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/08/25/google-matt-cutts-on-dot-jobs-domain/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alohandra</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/04/30/union-pacific-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-24844</link>
		<dc:creator>alohandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 15:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/04/30/union-pacific-jobs/#comment-24844</guid>
		<description>Joel,

In your opinion, how much does the &quot;.jobs&quot; suffix help here?  

H to the Izzo,
A.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel,</p>
<p>In your opinion, how much does the &#8220;.jobs&#8221; suffix help here?  </p>
<p>H to the Izzo,<br />
A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Fassett</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/04/30/union-pacific-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-24827</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Fassett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 13:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/04/30/union-pacific-jobs/#comment-24827</guid>
		<description>Joel, Union Pacific has built over 400 content specific pages within their www.unionpacific.jobs.  To your point, I agree their motivation likely has more to do with their own hiring needs and online employment strategy vs. pure search engine manipulation.  Nice to see that the effort &amp; display of quality content can still be &#039;organically&#039; rewarded.  There is an intersection between &quot;online employment strategy&quot; and low cost traffic acquisition as a result of concerted search engine optimization.  Effort is required.  Effort will be rewarded.  It&#039;s competitive but at the end of the day, content is king.  Strategies that can best gain recognition from the search providers for employment related content, I will leave to experts such as yourself.  :)

Ray Fassett
.jobs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel, Union Pacific has built over 400 content specific pages within their <a href="http://www.unionpacific.jobs" rel="nofollow">http://www.unionpacific.jobs</a>.  To your point, I agree their motivation likely has more to do with their own hiring needs and online employment strategy vs. pure search engine manipulation.  Nice to see that the effort &amp; display of quality content can still be &#8216;organically&#8217; rewarded.  There is an intersection between &#8220;online employment strategy&#8221; and low cost traffic acquisition as a result of concerted search engine optimization.  Effort is required.  Effort will be rewarded.  It&#8217;s competitive but at the end of the day, content is king.  Strategies that can best gain recognition from the search providers for employment related content, I will leave to experts such as yourself.  :)</p>
<p>Ray Fassett<br />
.jobs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

