<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: union pacific .jobs domain kickin&#8217; google ranking butt</title>
	<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/04/30/union-pacific-jobs/</link>
	<description>insight and opinion from the mind of joel cheesman</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 20:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: SEOBuilder</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/04/30/union-pacific-jobs/#comment-25127</link>
		<author>SEOBuilder</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 11:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/04/30/union-pacific-jobs/#comment-25127</guid>
		<description>I'm surprised you haven't picked up on Google booting CareerBuilder from their index.  You won't find them #1 anymore for any important keywords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised you haven&#8217;t picked up on Google booting CareerBuilder from their index.  You won&#8217;t find them #1 anymore for any important keywords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alohandra</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/04/30/union-pacific-jobs/#comment-24866</link>
		<author>alohandra</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 20:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/04/30/union-pacific-jobs/#comment-24866</guid>
		<description>Any indication if MSN and Yahoo! follow the same algorithm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any indication if MSN and Yahoo! follow the same algorithm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/04/30/union-pacific-jobs/#comment-24865</link>
		<author>joel</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 20:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/04/30/union-pacific-jobs/#comment-24865</guid>
		<description>http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/08/25/google-matt-cutts-on-dot-jobs-domain/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/08/25/google-matt-cutts-on-dot-jobs-domain/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cheezhead.com/2006/08/25/google-matt-cutts-on-dot-jobs-domain/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alohandra</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/04/30/union-pacific-jobs/#comment-24844</link>
		<author>alohandra</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 15:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/04/30/union-pacific-jobs/#comment-24844</guid>
		<description>Joel,

In your opinion, how much does the ".jobs" suffix help here?  

H to the Izzo,
A.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel,</p>
<p>In your opinion, how much does the &#8220;.jobs&#8221; suffix help here?  </p>
<p>H to the Izzo,<br />
A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Fassett</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/04/30/union-pacific-jobs/#comment-24827</link>
		<author>Ray Fassett</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 13:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/04/30/union-pacific-jobs/#comment-24827</guid>
		<description>Joel, Union Pacific has built over 400 content specific pages within their www.unionpacific.jobs.  To your point, I agree their motivation likely has more to do with their own hiring needs and online employment strategy vs. pure search engine manipulation.  Nice to see that the effort &#38; display of quality content can still be 'organically' rewarded.  There is an intersection between "online employment strategy" and low cost traffic acquisition as a result of concerted search engine optimization.  Effort is required.  Effort will be rewarded.  It's competitive but at the end of the day, content is king.  Strategies that can best gain recognition from the search providers for employment related content, I will leave to experts such as yourself.  :)

Ray Fassett
.jobs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel, Union Pacific has built over 400 content specific pages within their <a href="http://www.unionpacific.jobs." rel="nofollow">www.unionpacific.jobs.</a>  To your point, I agree their motivation likely has more to do with their own hiring needs and online employment strategy vs. pure search engine manipulation.  Nice to see that the effort &amp; display of quality content can still be &#8216;organically&#8217; rewarded.  There is an intersection between &#8220;online employment strategy&#8221; and low cost traffic acquisition as a result of concerted search engine optimization.  Effort is required.  Effort will be rewarded.  It&#8217;s competitive but at the end of the day, content is king.  Strategies that can best gain recognition from the search providers for employment related content, I will leave to experts such as yourself.  :)</p>
<p>Ray Fassett<br />
.jobs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
