http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/05/13/cheezhead-wiki/ Insight and opinion from the world of employment. Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:01:22 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/05/13/cheezhead-wiki/comment-page-1/#comment-27044 joel Wed, 16 May 2007 12:47:54 +0000 http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/05/13/cheezhead-wiki/#comment-27044 See No. 2. I believe it's good for both. If users can create pages that rank well, leveraging a strong domain like Cheezhead, then both parties win. In Nich Roy's example above, "iteaching.com" ranks well using the wiki, where the actual domain name fails to do so at this time. In this way, he's controlling the site's reputation (trying to keep out unflattering blog posts, maybe?) and driving traffic via searches done for that keyphrase as users click via links in the wiki. See No. 2. I believe it’s good for both. If users can create pages that rank well, leveraging a strong domain like Cheezhead, then both parties win. In Nich Roy’s example above, “iteaching.com” ranks well using the wiki, where the actual domain name fails to do so at this time. In this way, he’s controlling the site’s reputation (trying to keep out unflattering blog posts, maybe?) and driving traffic via searches done for that keyphrase as users click via links in the wiki.

]]> http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/05/13/cheezhead-wiki/comment-page-1/#comment-27019 Tim Wed, 16 May 2007 07:05:21 +0000 http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/05/13/cheezhead-wiki/#comment-27019 Regarding #1 - can you tell us how using your wiki is good for SEO? Considering your use of the nofollow, isn't it better for you than it is for the site user who enters the content? I don't follow. Regarding #1 – can you tell us how using your wiki is good for SEO? Considering your use of the nofollow, isn’t it better for you than it is for the site user who enters the content? I don’t follow.

]]>