<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: vertical search = better roi?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/05/22/vertical-search-roi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/05/22/vertical-search-roi/</link>
	<description>Insight and opinion from the world of employment.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 07:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven Rothberg, CollegeRecruiter.com</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/05/22/vertical-search-roi/#comment-27853</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Rothberg, CollegeRecruiter.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 04:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/05/22/vertical-search-roi/#comment-27853</guid>
		<description>We stopped buying cpc ads through SimplyHired and Indeed because they were unable to come anywhere close to delivering a positive ROI. Perhaps they can do so for third party and corporate recruiters but when they charge $0.25 per click and higher and only 5 percent of the clicks turn into registrations....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We stopped buying cpc ads through SimplyHired and Indeed because they were unable to come anywhere close to delivering a positive ROI. Perhaps they can do so for third party and corporate recruiters but when they charge $0.25 per click and higher and only 5 percent of the clicks turn into registrations&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
