http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/06/12/demise-friendster/ Insight and opinion from the world of employment. Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:01:22 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/06/12/demise-friendster/comment-page-1/#comment-30943 Jim Stroud Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:37:00 +0000 http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/06/11/demise-friendster/#comment-30943 Friendster may be dead in the USA, but its alive and kicking over in Asia. Friendster may be dead in the USA, but its alive and kicking over in Asia.

]]> http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/06/12/demise-friendster/comment-page-1/#comment-30930 Ricky Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:43:41 +0000 http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/06/11/demise-friendster/#comment-30930 Friendster is hardly a failure. With an Alexa ranking of 21 they will probably end up having a decent exit. Friendster is hardly a failure. With an Alexa ranking of 21 they will probably end up having a decent exit.

]]> http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/06/12/demise-friendster/comment-page-1/#comment-30841 Gil Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:06:17 +0000 http://www.cheezhead.com/2007/06/11/demise-friendster/#comment-30841 I disagree. Although there are a subset of people who do gawk at strangers, if everyone did that, there'd be no participation. If their theory is correct, then why is Facebook, which makes it hard to contact strangers, popular? I disagree. Although there are a subset of people who do gawk at strangers, if everyone did that, there’d be no participation. If their theory is correct, then why is Facebook, which makes it hard to contact strangers, popular?

]]>