<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: more layoffs at monster?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/03/06/more-monster-layoffs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/03/06/more-monster-layoffs/</link>
	<description>Insight and opinion from the world of employment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:01:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/03/06/more-monster-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-90818</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 00:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/03/06/more-layoffs-at-monster/#comment-90818</guid>
		<description>I work for an Internet property that Monster used to invest heavily in with online media.  They have decreased quite a bit over the past year and cancelled all together a short time ago.  They blamed it on the offline marketing investments.....ie. the commercials.   I don&#039;t get it.  Monster is an online destination.  You tell me....it is easier for people to reach their site via the Internet or the TV?  Doesn&#039;t seem like rocket science to me.  I have posed this scenario to other online properties that invest heavily in online media and they are stumped as well.  Not saying commercials are a bad thing but to sacrifice your bread and butter for a few primetime ads seems backwards to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work for an Internet property that Monster used to invest heavily in with online media.  They have decreased quite a bit over the past year and cancelled all together a short time ago.  They blamed it on the offline marketing investments&#8230;..ie. the commercials.   I don&#8217;t get it.  Monster is an online destination.  You tell me&#8230;.it is easier for people to reach their site via the Internet or the TV?  Doesn&#8217;t seem like rocket science to me.  I have posed this scenario to other online properties that invest heavily in online media and they are stumped as well.  Not saying commercials are a bad thing but to sacrifice your bread and butter for a few primetime ads seems backwards to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sk</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/03/06/more-monster-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-90555</link>
		<dc:creator>sk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/03/06/more-layoffs-at-monster/#comment-90555</guid>
		<description>oh snap, someones gonna be fired for leaving this!! :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh snap, someones gonna be fired for leaving this!! :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

