<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the chad and cheezhead podcast &#8211; episode II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/09/chad-cheezhead-podcast-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/09/chad-cheezhead-podcast-2/</link>
	<description>Insight and opinion from the world of employment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:01:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: (SNA)</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/09/chad-cheezhead-podcast-2/comment-page-1/#comment-99144</link>
		<dc:creator>(SNA)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/09/chad-cheezhead-podcast-2/#comment-99144</guid>
		<description>Another great show guys!

I would like to see video resumes integrate on-the-fly speech LVCSR (Large Vocabulary Continuous Speech Recognition) component for indexing and search.   Or good ol’ fashioned transcription to accompany the media.  Think earnings call transcription as an analogue.

This (Speech-to-text) is some of the fastest growing and maturing technology used in the contact center space, and video resumes will be more valuable when the script can be keyword indexed and searched alongside the text resume, or reviewed after screening the candidate attributes &amp; resume.   

…this will help with deliver a better return on time as you mentioned too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great show guys!</p>
<p>I would like to see video resumes integrate on-the-fly speech LVCSR (Large Vocabulary Continuous Speech Recognition) component for indexing and search.   Or good ol’ fashioned transcription to accompany the media.  Think earnings call transcription as an analogue.</p>
<p>This (Speech-to-text) is some of the fastest growing and maturing technology used in the contact center space, and video resumes will be more valuable when the script can be keyword indexed and searched alongside the text resume, or reviewed after screening the candidate attributes &amp; resume.   </p>
<p>…this will help with deliver a better return on time as you mentioned too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Person, Monster Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/09/chad-cheezhead-podcast-2/comment-page-1/#comment-98079</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Person, Monster Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/09/chad-cheezhead-podcast-2/#comment-98079</guid>
		<description>Hey, Joel.  Interesting podcast -- specifically your discussion about the video resumes.

My thoughts:
* Recruiters saying they don&#039;t have time to review video resumes may be the reality for many, but I don&#039;t think that&#039;s a very good excuse.  Many recruiters also say they don&#039;t have time to blog, monitor RSS feeds, jump into online conversations, join recruiting social networking groups, etc., but I think we know how important all of that is. 
* Recruiters not wanting to review video resumes for legal reasons could be another reason entirely.  And yes, it certainly &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; easy to find fault with someone straight away (even unconsciously) when viewing their video resume. But really, how is this different from a recruiter/hiring manager doing the very same thing at the face-to-face interview? 

I think it really comes down to when and where video resumes are appropriate. If there&#039;s an opening for a job where doing TV/video work is part of the job description, then asking for video resume submissions could make sense. If the position is for regular desk job, then it doesn&#039;t.

As for some direct engagement with Monster, consider following us back through Twitter. I added you yesterday from our at @MonsterCareers account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Joel.  Interesting podcast &#8212; specifically your discussion about the video resumes.</p>
<p>My thoughts:<br />
* Recruiters saying they don&#8217;t have time to review video resumes may be the reality for many, but I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s a very good excuse.  Many recruiters also say they don&#8217;t have time to blog, monitor RSS feeds, jump into online conversations, join recruiting social networking groups, etc., but I think we know how important all of that is.<br />
* Recruiters not wanting to review video resumes for legal reasons could be another reason entirely.  And yes, it certainly <i>is</i> easy to find fault with someone straight away (even unconsciously) when viewing their video resume. But really, how is this different from a recruiter/hiring manager doing the very same thing at the face-to-face interview? </p>
<p>I think it really comes down to when and where video resumes are appropriate. If there&#8217;s an opening for a job where doing TV/video work is part of the job description, then asking for video resume submissions could make sense. If the position is for regular desk job, then it doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>As for some direct engagement with Monster, consider following us back through Twitter. I added you yesterday from our at @MonsterCareers account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/09/chad-cheezhead-podcast-2/comment-page-1/#comment-97401</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 23:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/09/chad-cheezhead-podcast-2/#comment-97401</guid>
		<description>Having a video job req (you can see it here: http://blip.tv/file/671732) has been awesome for us. We&#039;ve had over 20 video responses and it&#039;s been an overwhelmingly positive experience. We&#039;ve met some fantastic candidates and they&#039;ve admitted that participating was really creative and fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having a video job req (you can see it here: <a href="http://blip.tv/file/671732)" rel="nofollow">http://blip.tv/file/671732)</a> has been awesome for us. We&#8217;ve had over 20 video responses and it&#8217;s been an overwhelmingly positive experience. We&#8217;ve met some fantastic candidates and they&#8217;ve admitted that participating was really creative and fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Manaster</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/09/chad-cheezhead-podcast-2/comment-page-1/#comment-96825</link>
		<dc:creator>David Manaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/09/chad-cheezhead-podcast-2/#comment-96825</guid>
		<description>Thanks for saying nice things about the ERE Expo guys!

Chad - have you ever sat down and talked with Kevin?  I&#039;m pretty sure that if you guys ever had a good conversation, your opinion would change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for saying nice things about the ERE Expo guys!</p>
<p>Chad &#8211; have you ever sat down and talked with Kevin?  I&#8217;m pretty sure that if you guys ever had a good conversation, your opinion would change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/09/chad-cheezhead-podcast-2/comment-page-1/#comment-96812</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/09/chad-cheezhead-podcast-2/#comment-96812</guid>
		<description>Love it! Only remorse is that you and Chad can&#039;t do these everyday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love it! Only remorse is that you and Chad can&#8217;t do these everyday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric shannon</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/09/chad-cheezhead-podcast-2/comment-page-1/#comment-96806</link>
		<dc:creator>eric shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/09/chad-cheezhead-podcast-2/#comment-96806</guid>
		<description>another good show guys, congratulations.  interest point you raise joel about favoring companies over job boards using &#039;relevancy&#039;.  keep them coming!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another good show guys, congratulations.  interest point you raise joel about favoring companies over job boards using &#8216;relevancy&#8217;.  keep them coming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

