<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: bounty of good news for jobfox</title>
	<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/13/jobfox-news/</link>
	<description>insight and opinion from the mind of joel cheesman</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 19:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/13/jobfox-news/#comment-99602</link>
		<author>Paul</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/13/jobfox-news/#comment-99602</guid>
		<description>If JobFox is such a great tool, why can't they rely on it to make internal hires? I noticed a while back that they posted a job on my job board...

http://www.smuz.com/jobs/JobSeeker/index.cfm?page=position-description&#38;start=1&#38;jobid=1013

Glad to help :-)

Paul Pickthorne
chief Free Officer
Smuz.com - 100% Free Job Board</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If JobFox is such a great tool, why can&#8217;t they rely on it to make internal hires? I noticed a while back that they posted a job on my job board&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.smuz.com/jobs/JobSeeker/index.cfm?page=position-description&amp;start=1&amp;jobid=1013" rel="nofollow">http://www.smuz.com/jobs/JobSeeker/index.cfm?page=position-description&amp;start=1&amp;jobid=1013</a></p>
<p>Glad to help :-)</p>
<p>Paul Pickthorne<br />
chief Free Officer<br />
Smuz.com - 100% Free Job Board</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Letourneau</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/13/jobfox-news/#comment-99085</link>
		<author>Joshua Letourneau</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/13/jobfox-news/#comment-99085</guid>
		<description>Sounds cool, but technology will never take the place of a human being.  Candidates are too sick &#38; tired of filling out 'profiles', 'assessments', and 'questionaires' on career/job-board sites that not too many are going to use a matching-service like e-Harmony . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds cool, but technology will never take the place of a human being.  Candidates are too sick &amp; tired of filling out &#8216;profiles&#8217;, &#8216;assessments&#8217;, and &#8216;questionaires&#8217; on career/job-board sites that not too many are going to use a matching-service like e-Harmony . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (SNA)</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/13/jobfox-news/#comment-98523</link>
		<author>(SNA)</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/13/jobfox-news/#comment-98523</guid>
		<description>I'm intrigued by the tracking code that’s injected in the modified Word resume.

Is it analogous to the 1x1 pixels often used in email marketing campaign tools or a different type of tracking code or system?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m intrigued by the tracking code that’s injected in the modified Word resume.</p>
<p>Is it analogous to the 1&#215;1 pixels often used in email marketing campaign tools or a different type of tracking code or system?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Cheesman</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/13/jobfox-news/#comment-98076</link>
		<author>Joel Cheesman</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/13/jobfox-news/#comment-98076</guid>
		<description>Yep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason davis</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/13/jobfox-news/#comment-98070</link>
		<author>jason davis</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/13/jobfox-news/#comment-98070</guid>
		<description>Hey Joel, is the the company you wrote about a while back that was embedding some code is the candidate resumes so the candidates could see when their resume was being looked at? I can't remember. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Joel, is the the company you wrote about a while back that was embedding some code is the candidate resumes so the candidates could see when their resume was being looked at? I can&#8217;t remember. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Humphrey</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/13/jobfox-news/#comment-97817</link>
		<author>Rob Humphrey</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 03:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/13/jobfox-news/#comment-97817</guid>
		<description>I am about to finally finish on on research "project" where i tracked 10 jobseekers from the first day of the job fox launch....if ya cant wait for my blog post...i would be happy to email the headlines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am about to finally finish on on research &#8220;project&#8221; where i tracked 10 jobseekers from the first day of the job fox launch&#8230;.if ya cant wait for my blog post&#8230;i would be happy to email the headlines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Sentell</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/13/jobfox-news/#comment-97799</link>
		<author>John Sentell</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/13/jobfox-news/#comment-97799</guid>
		<description>The site does not work. That Webby thing is joke is they are actually awarded it. Every "match" has been inappropriate - either WAY below my career level or WAY above. It seems as though they are only capable on matching by keyword - despite their claims.  My friends, who have had the patience to get through their questions and  faith to believe their hype...have had similar experiences as me and think the same things. I think they are just very well funded, with a big name CEO. But their product does not work. (Besides - why would they assume that anyone looking for a job needs a web-site too match for them? That is a bit of an insulting assumption...) I am really interested what other folks experiences have been with Jobfox...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The site does not work. That Webby thing is joke is they are actually awarded it. Every &#8220;match&#8221; has been inappropriate - either WAY below my career level or WAY above. It seems as though they are only capable on matching by keyword - despite their claims.  My friends, who have had the patience to get through their questions and  faith to believe their hype&#8230;have had similar experiences as me and think the same things. I think they are just very well funded, with a big name CEO. But their product does not work. (Besides - why would they assume that anyone looking for a job needs a web-site too match for them? That is a bit of an insulting assumption&#8230;) I am really interested what other folks experiences have been with Jobfox&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Humphrey</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/13/jobfox-news/#comment-97712</link>
		<author>Rob Humphrey</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/13/jobfox-news/#comment-97712</guid>
		<description>"the profile-based matching websites offer a dramatic improvement over the onerous keyword searching"

Great theory. Really. I said almost the excat same thing when I ran careercowboy.com.

And kudos to Jobfox for the awards. 

Where these folks are missing the boat is in building a following. They are leveraging technology well but only building temporary communities. The value prop around "better matching" is old school. 

As a job seeker, if you end up as an applicant in a resume vortex, what s the freaking difference? As an employer if your reach is the same community reached by monster etc how is that different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the profile-based matching websites offer a dramatic improvement over the onerous keyword searching&#8221;</p>
<p>Great theory. Really. I said almost the excat same thing when I ran careercowboy.com.</p>
<p>And kudos to Jobfox for the awards. </p>
<p>Where these folks are missing the boat is in building a following. They are leveraging technology well but only building temporary communities. The value prop around &#8220;better matching&#8221; is old school. </p>
<p>As a job seeker, if you end up as an applicant in a resume vortex, what s the freaking difference? As an employer if your reach is the same community reached by monster etc how is that different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jindrich Liska</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/13/jobfox-news/#comment-97711</link>
		<author>Jindrich Liska</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/04/13/jobfox-news/#comment-97711</guid>
		<description>Hi Joel,

Very nice summary – I would only add Vitruva, www.vitruva.com, to your list of the next–generation job matching web sites. Our matching accuracy is about 2-3x higher than that of Jobfox mostly due to an extensive use of artificial intelligence technology. That allowed us to introduce the first and only career website that offers a performance-based business model. Employers pay only when they receive the best-qualified candidates for a posted job opportunity. 

In addition, we allow job candidates to have multiple profiles at the same time. In each profile they can emphasize different strengths thereby targeting different types of opportunities. Furthermore, job candidates using Vitruva have much stronger control over their confidentiality. They can not only give permission to an employer (as on Jobfox) but also they can remove the permission anytime. 

The users’ favorite is the capability to refine matching results on-the-fly without a time-consuming process of opening, editing, and saving a profile. You can see this in our live demo at www.vitruva.com.

Whether Vitruva, Jobfox or others – the profile-based matching websites offer a dramatic improvement over the onerous keyword searching and, most importantly, both job candidates and employers benefit.

Jindrich Liska 
(full disclosure: I am a founder of www.vitruva.com)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joel,</p>
<p>Very nice summary – I would only add Vitruva, <a href="http://www.vitruva.com," rel="nofollow">www.vitruva.com,</a> to your list of the next–generation job matching web sites. Our matching accuracy is about 2-3x higher than that of Jobfox mostly due to an extensive use of artificial intelligence technology. That allowed us to introduce the first and only career website that offers a performance-based business model. Employers pay only when they receive the best-qualified candidates for a posted job opportunity. </p>
<p>In addition, we allow job candidates to have multiple profiles at the same time. In each profile they can emphasize different strengths thereby targeting different types of opportunities. Furthermore, job candidates using Vitruva have much stronger control over their confidentiality. They can not only give permission to an employer (as on Jobfox) but also they can remove the permission anytime. </p>
<p>The users’ favorite is the capability to refine matching results on-the-fly without a time-consuming process of opening, editing, and saving a profile. You can see this in our live demo at <a href="http://www.vitruva.com." rel="nofollow">www.vitruva.com.</a></p>
<p>Whether Vitruva, Jobfox or others – the profile-based matching websites offer a dramatic improvement over the onerous keyword searching and, most importantly, both job candidates and employers benefit.</p>
<p>Jindrich Liska<br />
(full disclosure: I am a founder of <a href="http://www.vitruva.com" rel="nofollow">www.vitruva.com</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
