Sponsored by Job CentralRSS

peter weddle on current job board strategies

Fri, May 16, 2008

Video

Peter Weddle discusses the importance of job boards attracting passive job seekers as they evolve and hope to compete against a growing number of competitors.

,



Related Posts



This post was written by:

Joel Cheesman - who has written 1226 posts on Cheezhead.

One of the most widely-read bloggers on emerging recruitment issues in the world. Accomplishments include being named Recruiting.com’s Best Technology Recruitment Blog and Best Recruiting Blog. Joel's been featured in Fast Company magazine, BusinessWeek Magazine, Resumes for Dummies, U.S. News & World Report, The Wall Street Journal and more. Plug into Joel via Twitter, MySpace, Facebook, iTunes, YouTube or Flickr.

Contact the author

2 Comments For This Post

  1. eric shannon Says:

    have worked with Peter on the phone often, but never seen even a picture — so thanks Joel. Wish I could be there.

  2. christohper Poreda Says:

    I hear a lot about the passive job seekers and attracting these candidates through a variety of means. The fact is, everyone in the workforce is in the market all the time. Heal a pain and you convert a passive job seeker to an active job seeker…more money, bigger title, more/or less responsibility, shorter commute, fewer hours, etc. Although I appreciate all the technological efforts to motivate such a candidate, technology, as innovative as it is, will always fall short to a human picking up the phone and “career counseling” a passive job seeker and converting them into an active job seeker. Am I alone on this one? Even the most client centric job boards, if working properly, will create competition for the top candidates. Hence, I would imagine that the lion share of the best conversions are done by third party recruiters. Recruiters don’t get fees for shoveling resumes…the premium is to have the candidate that the client wants to say “Yes”!

    Even with rich content as a means to attract passive candidates I would guess the conversion rate of a passive candidate to active at these websites is small. Any ideas?

Leave a Reply