<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: theladders switches affiliate networks&#8230;but why?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/10/15/ved-theladders-changes-affiliate-programs-but-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/10/15/ved-theladders-changes-affiliate-programs-but-why/</link>
	<description>Insight and opinion from the world of employment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:01:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2008/10/15/ved-theladders-changes-affiliate-programs-but-why/comment-page-1/#comment-116963</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/?p=1836#comment-116963</guid>
		<description>Google Affiliate Network is actually not a &quot;new&quot; network. It was formally known as Performics, and has been around for about 10 years. Also, TheLadders was working with CJ, through the Converseon agency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Affiliate Network is actually not a &#8220;new&#8221; network. It was formally known as Performics, and has been around for about 10 years. Also, TheLadders was working with CJ, through the Converseon agency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

