<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the death of print</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/05/18/the-death-of-print/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/05/18/the-death-of-print/</link>
	<description>Insight and opinion from the world of employment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:01:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ModLife &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top Ten Misunderstood News Headlines</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/05/18/the-death-of-print/comment-page-1/#comment-119873</link>
		<dc:creator>ModLife &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top Ten Misunderstood News Headlines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/?p=5784#comment-119873</guid>
		<description>[...] (Image Above: Cheezhead.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Image Above: Cheezhead.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: point local</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/05/18/the-death-of-print/comment-page-1/#comment-118577</link>
		<dc:creator>point local</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/?p=5784#comment-118577</guid>
		<description>Great post. As newspapers drift, the local search online is positioning to take the local communities by storm. As mobile communication companies follow the footsteps of the leader iPhone, we should see more people using cellphones to search locally online for services and products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. As newspapers drift, the local search online is positioning to take the local communities by storm. As mobile communication companies follow the footsteps of the leader iPhone, we should see more people using cellphones to search locally online for services and products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Media: What Did We Do Before? &#171; The Dobbs Method</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/05/18/the-death-of-print/comment-page-1/#comment-117994</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Media: What Did We Do Before? &#171; The Dobbs Method</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/?p=5784#comment-117994</guid>
		<description>[...] if Watergate happened in the world people are talking about in which news print no longer exists and all news is produced by bloggers and other social media [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if Watergate happened in the world people are talking about in which news print no longer exists and all news is produced by bloggers and other social media [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tricia Folliero</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/05/18/the-death-of-print/comment-page-1/#comment-117891</link>
		<dc:creator>Tricia Folliero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 21:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/?p=5784#comment-117891</guid>
		<description>I thought you might appreciate an “open letter ad” NAA recently distributed:

The Reality About Newspapers
In the past two years, the newspaper business has faced unprecedented financial challenges. The economic meltdown and advertising recession have hit our industry hard. But make no mistake about this: newspaper media – print and digital – remains strong and will emerge from the current environment an even stronger multi-platform force.

Here is the reality about newspapers today:

1. Myth: No one reads newspapers anymore.
Reality: More than 104 million adults read a print newspaper every day, more than 115 million on Sundays. That’s more people than watch the Super Bowl (94 million), American Idol (23 million) or that typically watch the late local news (65 million).

2. Myth: Young people no longer read newspapers.
Reality: 61 percent of 18-24 year olds and 25-34 year olds read a newspaper in an average week and 65 percent of them read a newspaper or visited a newspaper website in the past week.

3. Myth: Newspaper readership is tanking.
Reality: Average weekday newspaper readership declined a mere 1.8 percent between 2007 and 2008, and about 7 percent since its peak in 2002. Compare that to the 10 percent decline seen in the prime time TV audience in 2007 alone. Meanwhile, newspapers’ Web audience has grown nearly 75 percent since 2004, to 73 million unique visitors a month.

4. Myth: Many newspapers are going out of business.
Reality: Newspapers, as individual businesses, by and large remain profitable enterprises – with operating margins that Wall Street analysts estimate will generally average in the low to mid teens during 2009. While that may be down from historical highs, such margins would be the envy of many other industries today. As consultant John Morton said in a recent American Journalism Review article, &quot;Overall, the beleaguered newspaper industry&#039;s financial health has been weakened but remains healthy by most measures. In this environment, that is an achievement.&quot;

5. Myth: Newspaper advertising doesn’t work.
Reality: Google’s own research shows that 56 percent of consumers researched or purchased products they saw in a newspaper. Google also says that newspaper advertising reinforces online ads: 52 percent are more likely to buy products if they see it in the paper.

6. Myth: There are no creative options in newspapers.
Reality: Newspaper advertising options have exploded and now include shape and polybag ads, post-it notes, “we prints,” shingle spadeas, scented ads, taste-it ads, glow-in-the-dark, belly bands and temporary tattoos, as well as event and database marketing, behavioral targeting, e-mail blasts, e-newsletters and more.

7. Myth: If newspapers close, you will still be able to get news from other sources.
Reality: Newspapers make a larger investment in journalism than any other medium. Most of the information you read from “aggregators” and other media originated with newspapers. No amount of effort from local bloggers, non-profit news entities or TV news sources could match the depth and breadth of newspaper-produced content.
  
This is not a portrait of a dying industry. It’s illustrative of transformation. Newspapers are reinventing themselves to focus on serving distinct audiences with a variety of products, and delivering those audiences effectively to advertisers across media channels.
For more on the power of newspaper media, visit www.newspapermedia.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought you might appreciate an “open letter ad” NAA recently distributed:</p>
<p>The Reality About Newspapers<br />
In the past two years, the newspaper business has faced unprecedented financial challenges. The economic meltdown and advertising recession have hit our industry hard. But make no mistake about this: newspaper media – print and digital – remains strong and will emerge from the current environment an even stronger multi-platform force.</p>
<p>Here is the reality about newspapers today:</p>
<p>1. Myth: No one reads newspapers anymore.<br />
Reality: More than 104 million adults read a print newspaper every day, more than 115 million on Sundays. That’s more people than watch the Super Bowl (94 million), American Idol (23 million) or that typically watch the late local news (65 million).</p>
<p>2. Myth: Young people no longer read newspapers.<br />
Reality: 61 percent of 18-24 year olds and 25-34 year olds read a newspaper in an average week and 65 percent of them read a newspaper or visited a newspaper website in the past week.</p>
<p>3. Myth: Newspaper readership is tanking.<br />
Reality: Average weekday newspaper readership declined a mere 1.8 percent between 2007 and 2008, and about 7 percent since its peak in 2002. Compare that to the 10 percent decline seen in the prime time TV audience in 2007 alone. Meanwhile, newspapers’ Web audience has grown nearly 75 percent since 2004, to 73 million unique visitors a month.</p>
<p>4. Myth: Many newspapers are going out of business.<br />
Reality: Newspapers, as individual businesses, by and large remain profitable enterprises – with operating margins that Wall Street analysts estimate will generally average in the low to mid teens during 2009. While that may be down from historical highs, such margins would be the envy of many other industries today. As consultant John Morton said in a recent American Journalism Review article, &#8220;Overall, the beleaguered newspaper industry&#8217;s financial health has been weakened but remains healthy by most measures. In this environment, that is an achievement.&#8221;</p>
<p>5. Myth: Newspaper advertising doesn’t work.<br />
Reality: Google’s own research shows that 56 percent of consumers researched or purchased products they saw in a newspaper. Google also says that newspaper advertising reinforces online ads: 52 percent are more likely to buy products if they see it in the paper.</p>
<p>6. Myth: There are no creative options in newspapers.<br />
Reality: Newspaper advertising options have exploded and now include shape and polybag ads, post-it notes, “we prints,” shingle spadeas, scented ads, taste-it ads, glow-in-the-dark, belly bands and temporary tattoos, as well as event and database marketing, behavioral targeting, e-mail blasts, e-newsletters and more.</p>
<p>7. Myth: If newspapers close, you will still be able to get news from other sources.<br />
Reality: Newspapers make a larger investment in journalism than any other medium. Most of the information you read from “aggregators” and other media originated with newspapers. No amount of effort from local bloggers, non-profit news entities or TV news sources could match the depth and breadth of newspaper-produced content.</p>
<p>This is not a portrait of a dying industry. It’s illustrative of transformation. Newspapers are reinventing themselves to focus on serving distinct audiences with a variety of products, and delivering those audiences effectively to advertisers across media channels.<br />
For more on the power of newspaper media, visit <a href="http://www.newspapermedia.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.newspapermedia.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan McCarthy</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/05/18/the-death-of-print/comment-page-1/#comment-117873</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan McCarthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 17:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/?p=5784#comment-117873</guid>
		<description>Jen – 
Nice, comprehensive piece on the state of print journalism. 
Print newspapers shot themselves in both feet when they decided to give their content away online and lost focus on what their customers wanted. Instead, they measured success by the number of Pulitzer prizes they won.
I hope the industry can turn it around, and save itself. There still are a lot of people like me who love that morning paper and coffee, and I’m not sure bloggers are ready to fill the void that the loss of a local paper would leave. 
I’d like to think our journalism schools, like St. Bonaventure, are preparing their students for the future. I have a daughter attending Ithaca’s Park School of Communications, and she tells me they’re being given the skills to leapfrog to alternative media. At the end of the day, we’ll always need people who can communicate, no matter what the medium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jen –<br />
Nice, comprehensive piece on the state of print journalism.<br />
Print newspapers shot themselves in both feet when they decided to give their content away online and lost focus on what their customers wanted. Instead, they measured success by the number of Pulitzer prizes they won.<br />
I hope the industry can turn it around, and save itself. There still are a lot of people like me who love that morning paper and coffee, and I’m not sure bloggers are ready to fill the void that the loss of a local paper would leave.<br />
I’d like to think our journalism schools, like St. Bonaventure, are preparing their students for the future. I have a daughter attending Ithaca’s Park School of Communications, and she tells me they’re being given the skills to leapfrog to alternative media. At the end of the day, we’ll always need people who can communicate, no matter what the medium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jd Yancey</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/05/18/the-death-of-print/comment-page-1/#comment-117872</link>
		<dc:creator>Jd Yancey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 16:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/?p=5784#comment-117872</guid>
		<description>How many of these papers that are in trouble are supported by unions?  that&#039;s the major problem.  others that have gone under, like the Rocky Mountain News, they were one of two papers in that town. the stronger paper survived.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many of these papers that are in trouble are supported by unions?  that&#8217;s the major problem.  others that have gone under, like the Rocky Mountain News, they were one of two papers in that town. the stronger paper survived.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackc</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/05/18/the-death-of-print/comment-page-1/#comment-117859</link>
		<dc:creator>jackc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 06:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/?p=5784#comment-117859</guid>
		<description>i won&#039;t miss it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i won&#8217;t miss it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.055 seconds -->
