<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: only one job board ranks in top 50 properties</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/06/23/ved-only-one-job-board-ranks-in-top-50-properties-for-may/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/06/23/ved-only-one-job-board-ranks-in-top-50-properties-for-may/</link>
	<description>Insight and opinion from the world of employment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:01:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: update</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/06/23/ved-only-one-job-board-ranks-in-top-50-properties-for-may/comment-page-1/#comment-118426</link>
		<dc:creator>update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/?p=6817#comment-118426</guid>
		<description>A lot of people think that the traffic on a URL is what a media company reaches but this is silly.  Monster powers the job channel of NYtimes and NYTimes is number 18 on this list.  A sites network is the only way to gauge traffic unless the site doesnt have a network in which case the URL is the only way to see what their reach is.

How may job channels does Monster power?  I&#039;ll bet Monster blows CB away in terms of reaching candidates across their powered by network.  So who cares how much traffic is on their URL?  Its really irrelevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of people think that the traffic on a URL is what a media company reaches but this is silly.  Monster powers the job channel of NYtimes and NYTimes is number 18 on this list.  A sites network is the only way to gauge traffic unless the site doesnt have a network in which case the URL is the only way to see what their reach is.</p>
<p>How may job channels does Monster power?  I&#8217;ll bet Monster blows CB away in terms of reaching candidates across their powered by network.  So who cares how much traffic is on their URL?  Its really irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.cheezhead.com/2009/06/23/ved-only-one-job-board-ranks-in-top-50-properties-for-may/comment-page-1/#comment-118419</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheezhead.com/?p=6817#comment-118419</guid>
		<description>It is interesting that at number 43 is the Gannett Sites.  It seems the newspapers are beating the job boards on the net.  If they can figure out how to monetize it then they might pull through this.  Also, it looks like Yahoo Properties is #2 and Craigslist is #17.  It could spell trouble if these powerful properties started advertising jobs (yes, that is sarcasm.) The New York Times came in at #16. That is also not bad for a newspaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting that at number 43 is the Gannett Sites.  It seems the newspapers are beating the job boards on the net.  If they can figure out how to monetize it then they might pull through this.  Also, it looks like Yahoo Properties is #2 and Craigslist is #17.  It could spell trouble if these powerful properties started advertising jobs (yes, that is sarcasm.) The New York Times came in at #16. That is also not bad for a newspaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.452 seconds -->
