Sponsored by Job CentralRSS

monster did it first

Fri, Jul 10, 2009

News

There has been a lot of buzz around Yahoo HotJobs’ new pay-per-candidate pricing model. However, we recently learned that Yahoo wasn’t the first of the big three job boards to come up with such a plan.

It seems that Monster quietly released Candidate Spotlight, a performance-based pricing model, on June 20, five days prior to the Yahoo HotJobs‘ release. The most recent edition of Classified Intelligence Report from the AIM Group states that in December 2008, Monster launched the pay-per-candidate model in five test cities, including Boston, New York, San Francisco, Seattle and Cleveland.

The program allows employers to preview up to 20 candidates for free and purchase the profiles they want for $15 per candidate. So how does it work?

If a recruiter chooses the Candidate Spotlight model, Monster sorts through its candidate pool for each listing and then delivers the best applicants to the recruiter’s job folders or e-mail. Recruiters then only pay for resumes that interest them.

Monster analyzes the candidate pool and identifies the most relevant candidates for your open positions based on your job requirements. Candidates are selected based on their experience, job history, matching skills, qualifications and education. Overall, the Monster model claims to turbocharge your job posting, expand your pool of qualified candidates, save time and allow recruiters to only pay for performance.

Monster’s model is slightly different from the Yahoo HotJobs Pay Per Candidate model, which allows recruiters to cap the number of pre-screened candidates they receive per job posting. Recruiters purchase credits for each job posted and their account is only charged when a candidate applies for the job listing or clicks through to the recruiter’s hiring site.

Popularity: 7% [?]

,





Join Our Mailing List

Cheezhead's FREE Insider E-Mail (Get the Stuff Regular Readers Don't)



We're on Facebook!

Cheezhead | Promote Your Page Too
Cheezhead


Job Search

 Ex : sales, "software engineer"   Location(s) Ex : Dallas,TX or 75219 or TX
 


Related Posts



This post was written by:

Jennifer Carpenter - who has written 161 posts on Cheezhead Recruiting News and Opinion.

Jen Carpenter, originally from Wellsville, New York, was a staff writer for the Hornell Evening Tribune before becoming an employee of Cheezhead.com. Jen has a journalism/mass communications degree from St. Bonaventure University. She currently resides in Lakewood, Ohio.

Contact the author

6 Comments For This Post

  1. Paul Says:

    Indeed launched a pay-per-applicant product in 2007 and it has been successfully used by our clients ever since. The beta release was announced in May of that year, here:
    http://blog.indeed.com/2007/05/15/indeed-launches-ppa-pay-per-action-pay-per-applicant-beta/

    Paul
    CEO, Indeed

  2. Gal Almog Says:

    This is not pay for performance anymore then Yahoo’s is pay for performance. If you read the Monster PDF you will very clearly see -

    A) These $15 candidates are not for job postings, they are passive/database matches

    B) If you want to see these candidate spotlights, you have to buy a job posting FIRST then they will allow you to purchase additional candidate profiles for $15 each.

    I think they should rename this model “pay-to-post” at regular prices then pay more for each additional profile you need because the initial job posting bought didn’t work. Monster, Careerbuilder, Hotjobs etc cannot offer pay for performance pricing because it would mean giving up all their existing revenue and starting over.

  3. Josh Greenfield Says:

    We’re certainly the smallest company trying it…we’ve (ZAPOINT.COM) been in the PPCandidate game for about 7 months now, and are too in Beta. We call it ‘cost per introduction’. Unfortunatly, Monster and Yahoo (two dying giants)get all the love.

    The idea was a natural progression for this and any other search industry.

    Josh

  4. Jon Davidson Says:

    With such a densely packed pool of available talent in the marketplace and employers having such easy access to social media sites such as Linked-In, why would an employer need to pay $15 to view a run-of-the-mill candidate who has been spotted more places than Elvis?

  5. Dr Doom Says:

    This all leads to price erosion. Keep digging boys we will shovel our way out of this hole. 2009 recession changed the game forever there is no going back, revenues are not coming back to pre-recession levels and now all the big boys are undercutting each other racing to the bottom. Like Monster Founder Bill Warren said “The days of the big, expensive job boards are over.” Q2 earnings should be fun for everyone in the industry.

  6. Jason Kerr Says:

    Of course ‘pay-per-candidate you interview’ has been our model at QuietAgent from day 1 – why should you pay if you do not succeed?

    So here’s our next market leading solution – free recruitment.

    QuietAgent, along with 7-Eleven, Allstate, ADP, AT&T, Hewitt Associates, Hyatt Hotels & Resorts, Office Depot and Starbucks, have just launched FREE recruiting for every employer in America.

    Search, engage and hire as many candidates as you like for the next year – no fees whatsoever.

    Hire from over 50 million job seeker referrals to our candidate database made by Fortune 500 companies each year.

    Check out http://UnitedWeWork.org for more info,

    Follow that Monster / CB.

1 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. Monster Releases Candidate Spotlight | Jobs Portal Watch Says:

    [...] Cheezhead reports that Monster launched the pay-per-candidate model in five test cities late last year: Boston, New York, San Francisco, Seattle and Cleveland. [...]

Leave a Reply