We all know that President Barack Obama is doing everything in his power to try to pass healthcare reform. So far, politics have been at the center of that fight, with people on the left wanting one thing and people on the right wanting another. But how would healthcare reform affect those closest to the flame – employees in the healthcare industry itself.

At first glance, you might think that every doctor would be in favor of a new healthcare system – one that’s meant to help more people – but that’s not necessarily the case. Nor is it the case that every doctor is opposed to the plan.
The Healthcare Reform Plan
In order to understand the debate, it’s helpful to know the basic plan Obama is proposing. There are currently two versions of the bill, one in the House and one in the Senate, but both are similar. If you’re already insured through your employer, are paying for your own insurance plan or are on public assistance, the bill will most likely not affect you. But if you’re employed and under-insured, the plan would give you some relief.
Varying rules would require the self-employed, those employed by a small employer and those employed by a large employer to be covered and only responsible for a certain percentage of the premium. There also would be a public health plan option, which would allow people to purchase a plan that offers coverage similar to what government employees receive.
Another part of the proposed plan would provide incentives to healthcare professionals who use preventative measures to help patients, as opposed to a system where doctors are rewarded based on the number of surgeries they complete or the number of patients they see. This opens the door for a scenario in which those doctors who care more about the actual practice of medicine than the money they receive come out on top.
In Obama’s most recent town hall meeting in Shaker Heights, OH, a suburb of Cleveland, he touched on how healthcare professionals can focus on preventative measures to ultimately drive down costs. For example, he said, a doctor could point an overweight person in the direction of a nutritionist to help keep their weight down before they get diabetes, as opposed to later paying for surgery to amputate a foot.
“But the problem is, right now, that a lot of the health system doesn’t reimburse and incentivize that kind of preventive work and that wellness work,” he said. “And so what we want to do is absolutely in this reform package, there will be reimbursements for and incentives for prevention and wellness, and we’re going to make sure that those are the things that don’t require out-of-pocket costs for the patient so that they’re not being discouraged from using it, but rather they’re being encouraged from using it – that will make all the difference in the world.”
Just What the Doctor Ordered?
So, how do healthcare professionals feel about the plan? That’s a loaded question. On one hand, the American Medical Association has endorsed Obama’s plan. On the other, Sermo, the largest online community of physicians, released a letter opposing the plan, which was signed by more than 13,000 physicians.

You might think that deep down, regardless of what they say, everyone is in it for the money. That’s far from the truth, and the Cleveland Clinic has been able to prove that. The Clinic is often voted among the best hospitals in the country, if not the world, and has managed to provide the best care while keeping costs low, all the while only paying its doctors by salary. Does this lean toward the fact that those doctors who are forced to focus on patient care instead of monetary incentives end up doing the best job?
Obama recently visited the Cleveland Clinic, which he cites as an example of a successful healthcare operation. The Clinic, which began in 1921, has the second-largest group practice model, which allows it to increase efficiency and improve quality by controlling utilization and measuring quality and safety.
All parts of the clinic are integrated, making it easy for different professionals to work together and control and rationalize expenses. The Clinic has a strong health information technology system, which improves communication and reduces medical errors.
“We strongly believe that our focus on quality, efficiency, wellness and prevention combined with clinical innovation and health information technology positions Cleveland Clinic as a leader in healthcare and a model for the future,” Delos “Toby” Cosgrove, M.D., CEO and president of the Cleveland Clinic, said.
Because the Clinic pays its doctors a salary instead of a fee-for-service, there is no room for doctors to have any incentive to order expensive devices or unnecessary tests. Every physician has a one-year contract and doctors don’t receive tenure, bonuses or other financial incentives. Salaries and contract-renewal are based on the results of a comprehensive annual performance review.
The Clinic maintains 40,000 employees, making it the largest employer in Northeast Ohio, the second-largest employer in the state and the largest employer in the history of Cleveland. The institution employs 1,800 physicians and scientists in 120 medical specialties and sub-specialties. Obama said any system similar to that of the Cleveland Clinic would make it easier for doctors to implement some of the proposed changes.
“Now, that’s not maybe the thing that every doctor is going to want to do,” he said. “But there are other ways that we can take that same approach where they start thinking in terms of what’s needed for the patient, and making sure that they’re getting reimbursed for what’s good for the patient, and they don’t then have to worry about what’s the government saying, or what’s the insurance company saying; am I going to get reimbursed for this, am I not going to get reimbursed for this, do I have to fill out 15,000 forms.
“I’ve said before, most people who are doctors or nurses, they didn’t get into it to fill out forms; they got into it to make people feel better, to heal the sick, and that’s what we want to free them up to do, but it will take a little time to get there,” Obama added.
The Mayo Clinic, which Obama also often cites as an example of a successful healthcare system, initially opposed the reform plan, saying lawmakers failed to focus on changing the Medicare payment policy. However, the Mayo Clinic later adjusted its thinking when it became aware the healthcare reform plan would include the development of an Independent Medicare Advisory Council, which would provide a “value-based payment” model.
The Future of the Industry
Healthcare is often considered to be a recession-proof career, which has a lot of recent graduates and those looking for a career change turning to the industry. The President’s Council of Economic Advisers recently released a report predicting that healthcare jobs will show the biggest gains between now and 2016.
However, a June report from MedZilla found that hospital systems have continued to eliminate healthcare jobs and leave open positions unfilled because of a loss of profits, an increase in uninsured patient care and a decrease in reimbursements from insurance companies, including Medicare and Medicaid.

On top of that, there is already a shortage of qualified professionals to fill open positions. Adding to that concern, opponents of the reform bill are worried it will deter prospective doctors from pursuing a medical degree. And some are worried the reform would put doctors in a tough spot by forcing them to make moral decisions, making patients wait long amounts of time for procedures or even turning them away.
In order to combat that type of situation, it has been suggested the bill include a provision that expands primary care and nurse training programs to help increase the size of the workforce. That measure would include strengthening grant programs for primary care training institutions and increasing existing preventive medicine programs. The bill also would improve existing student loan, scholarship and loan repayment programs.
So it seems as though there is a great divide among those in the healthcare industry as to whether or not Obama’s reform plan would ultimately help them. But should that be the main concern? Ask yourself if you’d rather have your doctor focusing on how to add a few more dollars to his wallet or how to take the best care of you.
Perhaps instead of worrying about not making surplus amounts of money, doctors should worry about helping patients any way they can, whether that’s through becoming more aligned with other departments in their institution, focusing on preventative measures for patients or accepting a salary, like those at the Cleveland Clinic.
We all want to make money – that’s half the reason for getting a job in the first place – but does a doctor have an obligation to put the patient first and the money second? That probably depends on why they went into the healthcare industry in the first place.
Popularity: 3% [?]










July 28th, 2009 at 11:59 am
I want the doctor to be motivated to be the best he can be and I find that a free capitalistic arena provides that incentive. Just like with recruiters. And I want to have access to the worlds best healthcare and any socialist system has fallen far short of this…I don’t see Obama as the one to fix this. And I suspect he knows that he will get the best healthcare no matter what he shoves off on us.
July 28th, 2009 at 12:41 pm
So doctors opposed to socialized medicine are just greedy and value a few more dollars over patient health? Quite insulting if you ask me. I know many many excellent doctors horrified by this healthcare bill who care nothing about the money. They understand reality based on other countries. They will be forced to reduce care and eliminate procedures based on government mandates to reduce cost. One only need to look north to Canada to understand the nightmare we’re in for. Their sickest patients come to us for care, because they would have to wait months for treatment or serious and life-threatening illnesses otherwise.
July 28th, 2009 at 2:32 pm
I think universal health care like most human aspirations is a great idea. Unfortunately the plans that are being discussed in Washington are far from anything that we would ever want. Every major program that has been created as a panacea to solve a certain social problem has either failed or is on the verge of insolvency/bankruptcy: social security (insolvent for the next generation), medicare (costs are spiraling out of control), the war on drugs (failed), and the war on poverty/the Great Society (failed). With such a track record and billions if not trillions of dollars spent on these programs why would we add another one?
Additionally while many politicians claim that any new tax increases will only affect the rich in almost every case of major tax increases, politicians have eventually raised taxes on the middle and lower classes. Take the income tax for example, the tax started as only a 1% tax on the wealthiest individuals. Now that tax will stand at almost 40% for the highest income earners and even lower income earners feel its weight. Or the social security tax. It too started at 1% in 1937 and FDR said it would ensure that everyone had a ’safety net’. Today that tax stands at 6.2% of your income with your employer paying an additional 6.2% tax. Just imagine what you could do with an extra 12.4% of your income…you could probably afford health insurance.
This discussion on taxes doesn’t even begin to touch the fact that government will run multi-trillion dollar deficits over the next 10 years and this plan would add at least another trillion dollars to the deficit. Not to mention the fact that we are seeing a public plan in action in Massachusetts and the state is already having trouble paying for it after only a few years since its creation.
Government run plans are an incredibly bad idea. What is the next step? Does the government need to step into the our auto or life insurance markets, or tell us what home we can buy? I completely agree that health care and its cost need to change, but the answer is not the government. To solve the most pressing problem (covering the 30-40 million uninsured Americans), we should create a system like auto insurance. Everyone is required to buy a minimum level from a private company. This minimum insurance policy is a ‘disaster type’ policy whereby it has a decent size deductible and covers the person for catastrophic events like surgeries, cancer, getting hit by a bus, etc. For those at the poverty line the government can provide rebates or tax credits to ensure that they can pay. After this immediate problem is solved, then we can look at other ways to reduce cost.
July 28th, 2009 at 3:52 pm
Obviously Healthcare reform willl have an impact on recruting and HR, but I am not sure what this post does. I thought this was a recruiting focused website. The good news is that at least it is a distraction from the usual Monster bashing.
July 29th, 2009 at 11:37 am
I think people mix up the idea of real health care reform with more basic healthcare expansion. The ideas on the table now are taking existing structures like Medicare, and expanding their reach dramatically.
But they aren’t doing anything meaningful to reform the system in a way that would improve care or cut costs. Medicare is the poster child for out of control costs and minimal ability to measure effectiveness.
Why the Dems would start with Medicare as the model is beyond me.
Their mantra is that we pay too much and get too little, but then they come up with a plan that hugely expands the current system.
July 29th, 2009 at 12:28 pm
I would rather go back to the Monster bashing (which I think is a bit overdone)then turn this into another site for political activists to air their opionions. Cheezhead was a website about recruitment.
To the author Jennifer; some of us in the recruitment world have been reading this site prior to your arrival and I am dissapointed that you believe that this has anything to do with recruitment. Sure, a change in healthcare will effect the recruitment of nurses and doctors but that is not even the focus of your political rant.
August 14th, 2009 at 4:49 pm
The last few paragraphs of this article really upset me. Particularly “Ask yourself if you’d rather have your doctor focusing on how to add a few more dollars to his wallet or how to take the best care of you.” This implies that without Obama’s healthcare reform all doctors only care about money. Most people don’t realize that doctors spend 4+ years in undergraduate and graduate programs on degrees they will never be able to use, then pay $200,000+ over the next 4 years to attend medical school, and then spend another 4+ years getting paid ~$40,000 a year during residency. Then, after 12+ years and hundreds of thousands of dollars debt (don’t forget about interest on those loans), they finally get to be a doctor. Students and residents commonly work 80+ hours each week to see all of their patients. If you do the math, residents are getting paid somewhere around $9/hr or less while paying loans off after 8 years of school, don’t forget to take our taxes, malpractice insruance, health insurance, and medical supplies from that payrate. Also, getting into medical school is very hard, so undergraduate isn’t a huge party like it is for some people – grades are important.
Then articles like this come out and paint the picture that doctors are selfish and purposely let people get diabetes just so they can make an extra buck. No one seems to have a problem with actors, musicians, and athletes getting paid obscene amounts of money, but the doctors who are literally saving lives and have given up all the young years of their lives for this profession are just horrible people and the only way to save them is Obama’s healthcare reform. How rude and judgemental.